Who is going to follow the code of conduct ? People who are breaking the code now !!! ???
I am trying to understand the intent of splitting. > -----Original Message----- > From: GVSN Naik [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:52 PM > To: Brian E Carpenter; Andy Bierman > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Splitting the IETF list > > Andy and Brian, > > Splitting IESG surely will decrease the traffic per List, but one > should aware which List handles what along with code of conduct for > each List. > > thanks > > Naik GVSN > Member of DCM Technologies Ltd., > 125, Udyog Vihar, Phase #5, Gurgaon 122001 INDIA > PBX: 91-124-6439224 FAX: 91-124-6439232 GSM: 91-9810492252 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:59 PM > To: Andy Bierman > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Splitting the IETF list > > > Andy, > > I don't see how this will help. The nonsense messages will still come, > from the usual sources, often copied to both lists, which will only > increase the level of annoyance. > > [Splitting the -announce list doesn't have this disadvantage.] > > Brian > > Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like the IESG to consider splitting this list into 2 lists. > > One list for discussion of Last Call issues and another for > > everything else (including minor stuff like splitting the > > IETF-Announce or IETF lists :-) > > > > thanks, > > Andy > >
