> > I don't see a "killer IPv6-based business app" as likely, but IPv6 > > does seem like a good way to solve some of the problems that NATs > > cause for communications between private v4 networks. It won't be > > a single app that causes businesses to shift, it will be the ability > > to run whatever protocols the businesses want to use to talk to each other. > > Hold on just a minute. Business applications are moving away > from limited client/server models towards synchronous or asynchronous > exchanges between systems that are sometimes clients and sometimes > servers. I don't want to rant at length here, but peer-to-peer business > apps are absolutely what we need for IPv6.
I think we're in strong agreement. I was only pointing out that the incentive for businesses to move to IPv6 might not be one or two well-known apps that everybody uses, but a more general need to use peer-to-peer communications between businesses. Keith
