Brian> NAT has simply pushed us back to the pre-1978 situation. 

On the contrary, NAT has  allowed us to maintain global connectivity without
requiring every system  to have a globally unique address.   NAT is what has
prevented us from returning to the pre-1978 situation.  

That's not  to say  it wouldn't be  better to  have a million  more globally
unique addresses.  Sure  it would, unless that would  stress out the routing
system  unduly.  If  adding a  million more  globally unique  addresses will
stress out  the routing system, then  one might argue that  a solution which
provides the  addresses but doesn't  change the routing system  isn't really
deployable, and hence  doesn't really solve the addressing  problem. I think
this is the point  that Noel keeps trying to drive home,  and I'm not sure I
understand what the answer is supposed to be. 

Reply via email to