From: Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011214093922.026ee218@localhost> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:11:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>At 04:29 PM 12/13/2001 -0500, borderlt wrote: > >There is a practical side to this. Note that John saw that the sheet was >hung in the queue. This can result in people not getting the sheet to >sign, and then the next meeting not getting a big enough room...... IEEE 802.11 / 802.15 meetings have solved this by attaching a helium ballon to their equivalent of the blue sheets. That way everyone can see where they are and if they have gotten hung up. Due to scaling problems, they are planning to change to using bar codes. From: Fred Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:55:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >At 08:45 PM 12/13/2001, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) wrote: >>This brings up another question: why are email addresses collected on the >>blue sheets? > >after a BOF that I chair, I generally get the blue sheet from the >Secretariat and make sure the email addresses are on the relevant mailer. Adding people from a BoF blue sheet to the activities mailing list is fine as long as you announce you are going to do that and allow people at the BoF to opt out, which is how I've seen it done. Thanks, Donald
