The ISOC should surely do it! If that does not destroy them, nothing will;-)...\Stef
At 16:55 -0800 27/01/02, Kyle Lussier wrote: > > > I seem to be getting two conflicting viewpoints: > > > > > > #1 Vendors can only be trusted to be interoperable on their own, > > > and can not be forced to conform. > > > > > > #2 Vendors absolutely can't be trusted to be interoperable, > > > without conformance testing. > > > > Kyle, in all kindness, you're missing the most fundamental > > viewpoint expressed here recently: The IETF isn't the place, > > nor is it the organization, that could or should take on the > > role of interoperability-cop. > >Some have proposed the ISOC as a body to do this kind of thing. > >Is it also public opinion that the ISOC should or shouldn't do >something like this? > >I agree with all of everything being said. We mostly just need >to find the "right" body to do this kind of thing, and it's >still gotta be a "jury of peers" for it to have any value. > >We need a "United Nations of Standards Citizenship". > >Kyle Lussier >AutoNOC LLC
