Bob Braden wrote: > *> I don't believe the intent of 2119 was to change the meanings of > *> "should", "must", etc., in RFCs, but rather to define new terms > *> "SHOULD", "MUST", etc., with specific new meanings. > *> > *> Keith > *> > > Keith's statement was certainly correct when we first introduced the > capitalized words in the Host Requirements RFCs (1122,1123).
Actually, MUST was first introduced in RFC1023 two years earlier :-)
The list is as follows:
1023 MUST
1085 MAY
1122 SHOULD
Joe
