At 03:18 PM 4/15/2002 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: >Shutting down working groups when they fail to meet milestones is an option, >but it certainly doesn't help that other working group you mentioned, which >is waiting on the results of the one which is deadlocked.
That other working group is already being not served. Holding a working group to its milestones makes the situation more explicit. Query to the group: If we believe we should not hold working groups to their milestones, why bother to have those milestones? d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
