This is a serious allegation that merits investigation I think. See below.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "krose@ntia. doc. gov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ksmith@ntia. doc. gov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "mcade@att. com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Eric. Menge@sba. gov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Elisabeth. Porteneuve@cetp. ipsl. fr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "orobles@nic. mx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Amadeu@nominalia. com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "f. fitzsimmons@att. net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ken. fockler@sympatico. ca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "mkatoh@mkatoh. net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "hans@icann. org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "shkyong@kgsm. kaist. ac. kr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "andy@ccc. de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "junsec@wide. ad. jp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "quaynor@ghana. com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "karl@cavebear. com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "linda@icann. org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "pindar@HK. Super. NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "vint cerf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Richard J Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "@Quasar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ellen Rony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jay@Fenello. com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jefsey Morfin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joanna Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Simon Higgs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "froomkin@law. miami. edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "love@cptech. org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Judith Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "steve@stevecrocker. com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:03 AM Subject: on IPv4 variants... > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg15777.html > From: "todd glassey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > - In the IPNG discussions, we decided to pursue IPv6 only. > > but if someone wanted to, would you have allowed them to persue a IPv4 > variant? > ---- > > Todd, > > People have clearly pursued "IPv4 variants" and the IETF does not like that. > The IETF censors people that design more useful protocols than their members. > After a period of time, the useful protocols then get renamed, with IETF members > claiming the invention and references to other people's work does not exist. > ICANN follows the same mentality. They walk all over other TLDs that exist and > assume they are the only game in town. They appeal to a brain-washed population > that has been told the I* society is the Internet. It is their way or the highway. > > Jim Fleming > > > >
