On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Sandy Wills wrote: > James Seng wrote: > > > bad idea for engineers to play lawyers. > > "Engineer" means "someone who takes dreams and makes them real". > > "Lawyer" means "someone who takes nightmares and makes them real". > > I'd rather have an engineer play lawyer, than have a lawyer play > engineer. > > Yes, you are right. My question was regarding the purpose of that (...legal framework...) in a RFC. When we see the damage of the additional article in the WIPO (for example the article 10/11 in the copyright article)... That generate the DMCA in US and the EUCD in Europe. So global legal framework are quite dangerous in a RFC. IMVHO. adulau
- RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspace" Alexandre Dulaunoy
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspace&q... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspa... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cybe... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "... James Seng
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of &... Sandy Wills
- Re: RFC3271 and independance ... Alexandre Dulaunoy
- Re: RFC3271 and independa... Robert Cannon
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspace&q... Einar Stefferud
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspace&q... Keith Moore
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspa... vint cerf
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cybe... Keith Moore
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of "... vint cerf
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of &... Keith Moore
- Re: RFC3271 and independance ... Einar Stefferud
- Re: RFC3271 and independa... Rens Troost
- Re: RFC3271 and independance of &... ggm
