At 05:38 PM 7/7/2002 -0400, Keith Moore wrote: >I do not share your opinion that someone who is interested in a particular >technology has an obligation to follow every WG that might try to alter >that technology. First of all, it's not obvious which groups might do >this-for instance who would guess that
an internet draft filename that contains the string "esmtp" is a pretty good clue. and remember that i-d's are announced, including their abstracts. the abstract for the current specification is pretty straightforward. d/ ps. to the extent that you perceive a larger, IETF-wide coordination issue, i suspect you will get agreement from many people. the hard part is in proposing a solution that those people will also agree with. ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
