More generally, see <http://www.normos.org/ietf/rfc/rfc2026.txt> to
understand the standards process.
- dan
--
Dan Kohn <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.dankohn.com/> <tel:+1-650-327-2600>
-----Original Message-----
From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 06:36
To: Dan Kohn
Cc: ietf
Subject: Re: which standard?
Hi Dan,
Thanks for clearing that up. I did see in RFC 2965 that it states it
obsoletes 2109, however I was confused as RFC 2965 is listed as a
_proposed_ standard.
Thanks to you now I know RFC 2965 is currently in effect.
Thanks,
Jane
Dan Kohn wrote:
>
> <http://www.normos.org/en/summaries/ietf/rfc/rfc2109.html> shows that
> RFC 2109 is obsoleted by RFC 2965. RFC 2965 also mentions this in the
> third line of the document.
>
> The canonical source of information on what obsoletes and is updated
by
> what is the RFC Editor's website:
> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index2.html>
>
> - dan
> --
> Dan Kohn <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <http://www.dankohn.com/> <tel:+1-650-327-2600>
> Essays announced on <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:44
> To: ietf
> Subject: which standard?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in reading up on cookies. Is RFC 2109 or RFC 2965
> currently in effect?
>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> Jane
>
> -
> This message was passed through [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> which
> is a sublist of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all messages are passed.
> Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Raffaele D'Albenzio.
