On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, vinton g. cerf wrote:
....

> The USG doesn't actually run the root server (although some of the
> root servers are in fact housed at USG supported laboratories). The
> Dept of Commerce in effect delegates the actual operation to the root
> server operators.

As a technical, legal, and historical matter the USG does not "delegate"
root server management to anyone.  Root server operators are volunteers
and self-organizing. The USG lacks the authority to tell them what to do,
or to fire them.  Indeed, as you note, some are not affiliated with the US
in any way. 

Nit-picking, yes, but fairly important when sorting out who has authority
over what.  (Cf.
http://personal.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/formandsubstance.pdf for
a discussion of the legal import of the root sever operator's legal
position.)

> The issue is less the size of the file than the problem of updating many 
> copies of it reliably. The root server operators find it a challenge to
> assure that even the modestly sized root zone file is correctly distributed
> to all root servers accurately and in a timely fashion. 

Are there statistics on this?  Certainly the published info I've seen is
more of the patting-self-on-back variety.  


-- 
                Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's hot here.<--


Reply via email to