> 3. The I in IETF means that the IETF shouldn't be working > sub-IP anyway. Many of these discussions (layer 2 VPNs, in > particular) would be better served by occuring within the context > of their original host organization (i.e., IEEE for ethernet over > IP),
Perhaps I missed something... What was it again that the I in IP stands for? Many of these discussions (e.g., that of Ethernet over IP) will clearly impact the [global] I in IETF. -danny
