For whatever it is
worth, I support Option 3 ("Status quo").
I think that the
"hard" decision (currently postponed) will be become simpler
as we shall see
conclusion of some of the WGs curently in the Sub-IP area and
probably creation of
some new ones.
Also why to change
something that is working just fine?
With best regards,
Sasha Vainshtein
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: +972-3-7659993
(office)
+972-8-9254948 (res.)
+972-58-674833 (cell.)
