On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 20:35:34 +0100, Florian Weimer said: > There was quite a bit rejection, and some very profound criticism (the > killer argument, IMHO, is that a large part of the industry does not > accept _any_ disclosure at all).
Wander over to NANOG - a large(*) part of the ISP industry doesn't seem to think that filtering RFC1918-space packets found on the public internet should be filtered either. Doesn't make it "right" in any sense of the term.... (*) large enough that some 30% of the traffic at the root nameservers is from 1918 source addresses - and these packets never got filtered. /Valdis
msg09858/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
