Re: CORRECTION: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational

[Adrian Farrel]

Title: RE: CORRECTION: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational

Hi Osama, It would appear that your draft references several other drafts that are not yet RFCs. Will you be removing these references? Thanks, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: Osama Aboul-Magd To: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALASO ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Adrian Farrel ; Atsushi Iwata ; Norihito Fujita ; Simon Marshall-Unitt ; Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi) ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Stephen Shew Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:24 PM Subject: RE: CORRECTION: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational Hi Gerry, This draft is not entirely about crankback. It only reflects agreements reached at the ITU. I'd be very happy referencing your draft have it been an RFC. Unfortunately ITU rules don't allow the referencing of work that is still in progress. Regards; Osama Aboul-Magd ATI Strategic Standards and Protocols Nortel Networks P.O. Box 3511, Station C Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y-4H7 Tel: +1 613 763 5827 e.mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALASO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALASO; Adrian Farrel; Atsushi Iwata; Norihito Fujita; Simon Marshall-Unitt; Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi); Aboul-Magd, Osama [CAR:1A00:EXCH]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CORRECTION: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational A crankback TLV is suggested in Section 4.3.  While crankback is a desirable extension to both CR-LDP and RSVP-TE (and required by ASON), the proposal ignores the prior work done in http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iwata-mpls-crankback-04.txt.  The advantages of the proposed method should be identified and justified.  Furthermore, crankback is not yet within the charter of any IETF Working Group, although this has been proposed (e.g., the IETF-54/CCAMP minutes state 'The charter update is way overdue. Items may be added - protection/restoration, crankback and multi-area operations'). It seems inappropriate to specify a particular crankback extension independent of the possible future work of an IETF Working Group. Jerry Ash -----Original Message----- From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 12:40 PM Subject: CORRECTION: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational **PLEASE NOTE THIS IS A TWO WEEK LAST CALL.** The IESG has received a request to consider CR-LDP Extensions for ASON <draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-crldp-ason-ext-02.txt> as an Informational RFC.  This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lists by 2003-1-15. Files can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-crldp-ason-ext-02.txt