See inline comments On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:34:46 +0700, Gary Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > >Also, is there any reason to introduce new language instead of using >existing language? ISP is already accepted for Internet Service Provider; >SP isn't
I want to encompass both webhosting firm and ISP. I agree it is clumsy to introduce a new acronym. Please offer a suggestion here. >The term "abuse" is already well-known to describe the >entire class of problems; calling it "pollution" is at best an annoying >distraction. Here I have a particular psychological point in mind. I want to build on the success in suppressing physical pollution, by moving to the "polluter pays" principle from the present "victim pays". If I use "polluter" the audience may more easily make the mental connection. Jeffrey Race
