Margaret Wasserman wrote: > No active IPv6 WG participant (whether or not he attends IETF > meetings) could credibly claim that he was unaware that this > discussion was taking place,
The discussion has been about potential usage limitation, or BCP's identifying application issues. The point of deprecation came out of nowhere, and only occurred in the room in SF. This has not had valid discussion. Tony > or that he has been denied an > opportunity to voice his opinion on this subject (in-person, > on the mailing list, or both). In fact, given the size and > scope of this discussion, there are probably very few IETF > participants who managed to miss the fact that this > discussion has been taking place. > > If you would like to express your technical opinion on the > site-local issue, I would suggest that you take it to the > IPv6 WG mailing list. I would be happy to continue a > technical discussion with you on that list. > > We will be publishing the minutes to the IPv6 meeting soon > and checking all of the consensus points reached during our > meetings on the IPv6 list shortly. Your input is definitely welcome. > > Margaret > > > > > > > >
