On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:31:23 -0500 John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > > As you know, I was in favor of setting aside a prefix (FECO::, in > > fact) for use as private address space (either on disconnected > > networks, or behind NATs), but the consensus of the folks in the > > IPv6 WG meeting was to deprecate that prefix altogether. There were > > several compelling arguments from operators and others that we don't > > need a special prefix for disconnected sites... > > Besides, we have three such prefixes, given RFC-1918 and 6to4: > 2002:A00::/24, 2002:AC10::/28, and 2002:C0A8::/32. the same problems exist for these as for SLs. we should deprecate these also when we revise 6to4.
