-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Bill" == Bill Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bill> Are the apps for which IPv6 is enabled that -can not-
Bill> use address literals? If so, then Steve is wrong and
yes.
Both IPv4 and IPv6 web browsers behave differently if you do,
for instance:
http://192.139.46.2/
vs http://www.sandelman.ca/
A different Host: header is sent, and therefore one gets a different
(virtual) web site. Of course, we have no need of this in IPv6, since
2^64 web sites per LAN is plenty, but the protocol still exists to do it.
Can we change this in IPv6? Maybe.
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBPopZtIqHRg3pndX9AQEc+wQA7lhFyoHXkIMopiYnh295B9R+8fpJxESt
dUGdIlbNUA6QwefQoHMkLo77teXn4cc2CxDI6RaE2t93FRxMOeJQUfgdT022UmQ/
co+cVhkyRXnweJb6DfwGfu3YHK/j+J7ScLw0TQ0FSAPFwGXHRbOmAppVD138hUJG
UXkPMLHDA/s=
=JyhG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
