Hi,
What is a 'radical anti-spammer'?
----------
This is the _false_ assertion of
radical anti-spammers, who seem to me to be the abusers. Chris Neill
(antispammer open relay abuser eventually fired from Verio--he was
ironically, an abuse admin) was shocked to learn he was't anonymous, like
he thought.
The claims made by antispammers about open relays are false. Type 1
spammers seem to get that, judging by their behavior. But radical
antispammers don't.
--Dean
On Wed, 28 May 2003, John Stracke wrote:
> Dean Anderson wrote:
>
> >We are lucky that spammers don't get a discount
> >
> Open relays give them a five-finger discount.
>
> --
> /===============================================================\
> |John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> |Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com |
> |Centive |My opinions are my own. |
> |===============================================================|
> |"Power corrupts; Powerpoint corrupts absolutely." -- Vint Cerf |
> \===============================================================/
>
>
>
>
