> Jeroen Massar wrote: > > [?Does this need to keep going to both [EMAIL PROTECTED] & > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Not as far as I am concerned. If we take the suggested path, the work > is clearly outside the IPv6 WG,
only because you insist that the layer belongs between 4 and 7. but since the layer belongs between 3 and 4, or maybe between 2 and 3, it clearly does impinge on IPv6.
