Bob,
A 2500 set? Why would you want something so modern and unreliable? After
all, this relies on DTMF ("touch tone") generators and decoders :-)
No sir, you want a 300 set. Introduced in 1937, this model generates
pulse-only dialling. [The 500 set, introduced in 1949, works too].
After the 1989 earthquake in the Bay Area, the 300 set saved my day. The
local switch (PLACAL02) would not budge on tone dialling, but pulse worked
just fine (using a non-mainstream LD carrier of course).
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Bob Natale wrote:
> Yes, we keep a couple of old "2500" telelphones around
> the house too...just for this purpose. I have often
> wondered why someone does not make a modern cordless
> phone with backup 2500 set capability built into the
> handset (which would need an RJ-11 jack as well, of
> course)?...in a power failure, one would then simply
> transfer the phone line from the electronic base into
> the handset, using the phone line power plus its internal
> battery to power the conversation and the buttons/lights
> respectively...or something like that...that doesn't seem
> too burdensome, given the existing capabilities of the
> handsets anyway...does it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> BobN
>
