Vernon Schryver wrote:I've been compiling a list in the style of Jeff Foxworthy.
You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If
Please publish this as an RFC. A collection of unworkable approaches
to the spam problem (anti-spam anti-patterns) is useful knowledge that
should be preserved and promulgated to reduce the Anti-Spam Kook problem.
On the other hand there seems to be considerable interest into declaring the spam problem unsolvable. I don't think it's a good idea to lend credibility to this sentiment by publishing it as an RFC.
How hard is it to agree that:
a) there will always be (some) spam b) there is no need for it to be 50% of all mail
