Hi -

http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html

Carl

> I've just got to ask... I am seeing news that BIND  WILL BE patched with
> this kind of support in it. 
> 
> Is this a sponsored patch, or is it just a random person posting a patch
> - that if applied would have this functionality
> 
> Bill
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
> Vixie
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To
> Us]
> 
> 
> > It is worth noting that if we are to "pass judgement against" Verisign
> 
> > there are at least half-dozen other TLDs that blazed the trail.  We 
> > just overlooked them because of their size as compared to .NET and 
> > .COM.
> 
> when people started beating on my phone ringer about wildcards yesterday
> evening, and screaming for patches to bind to somehow make it all
> better, i asked "but other tld's do this, what's the big deal?"  as near
> as i can figure it, the problem is one of expectation.  if someone signs
> up for .nu they know there'll be a wildcard there before they sign, and
> they can take appropriate precautions (like only using it for web or
> e-mail, and not naming hosts under that tld).  the expectations for .com
> and .net to not have wildcards were all set many years ago, and it's the
> violation of those expectations that's got people angry enough to
> publish patchware about it.
> -- 
> Paul Vixie
> 
> 

Reply via email to