On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:22:02 EDT, John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> role. As the W3C note sort of points out, that would be very > disruptive and would serve no one's interests, least of all that > of ISO's status and reputation. The same week as Verisign's stunt. Coincidence? Maybe not... ;)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
