In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>Hi Scott,
>
>> But, for what it's worth, I do not think that there was sufficient
>> discussion of the option of deprecating SL addresses before
>> the consensus check was made. So, in a way, I think the consensus
>> was wrongly reached, even if I agree that consensus was reached.
>
>If the San Francisco meeting was the only time/place that the IPv6
>WG had discussed the topic of what to do regarding IPv6 site-local
>addressing, then I might agree with you.
What Margaret said. This is hardly the first time the issue has come
up; it's been debated for years.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
