Vernon,
I'm not much for mission statements either. But it's easy to fall into
a "Dilbert" view of the world, even when such things might actually help.
I think the intent is to derive from some community consensus on goals
how to evolve the organization. And we are at a crossroads. Either we
pretty much limit our scope to a more confined area, or we need to grow.
And growing is painful. It involves changing of responsibilities,
delegation, and the like. If a mission statement serves as a point of
consensus from which the IETF management can march, I'm all for it, in
principle.
Of course, it has to have sufficient substance that one can in fact
derive a direction for management of the organization.
Eliot
- Re: IETF mission boundaries (Re: IESG pro... Bill Manning
- Re: IETF mission boundaries (Re: IESG pro... Eric Rosen
- Re: IETF mission boundaries (Re: IESG... Vernon Schryver
- Re: IETF mission boundaries (Re: ... Eric Rosen
- Re: IETF mission boundaries ... Vernon Schryver
- Re: IETF mission boundar... Eric Rosen
- Re: IETF mission boundar... Vernon Schryver
- Re: IETF mission boundar... mark seery
- Re: IETF mission boundar... Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF mission boundar... Vernon Schryver
- Re: IETF mission boundar... Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF mission boundaries (Re: IESG... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF mission boundaries (Re: IESG pro... Michael Richardson
- Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF missi... Simon Woodside
- Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF m... masataka ohta
- RE: IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission Margaret . Wasserman
- Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF missi... Scott W Brim
- Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF missi... Scott W Brim
- RE: IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission john . loughney
- RE: IESG proposed statement on the IETF missi... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF m... Spencer Dawkins
