Thus spake "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What I'm missing is guidance on how to make use of the available
> frequency space in the best way possible. Obviously doing everything on
> channel 6 as we saw yesterday (but has changed now) isn't the best
> approach. Using the non-overlapping channels 1, 6 and 11 is much
> better, but from what little I know about radio and encoding schemes I
> strongly suspect that controlled use of overlapping channels would lead
> to the best results in situations like these meetings.

Testing has shown that using channels 1, 4, 8, and 11 doesn't lead to
performance impact either; the minor overlap is not enough to cause packet
loss.

Should this move to NANOG, perhaps?

S

Stephen Sprunk         "God does not play dice."  --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723         "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS        dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking


Reply via email to