-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On fredag, nov 28, 2003, at 20:10 Europe/Stockholm, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > >> Ah, I see what you mean now. However, the devision is a done deal as >> RFC 3513 mandates that all unicast IPv6 addresses except the ones >> starting with the bits 000 must have a 64-bit interface identifier in >> the lower 64 bits. This has some important advantages, most notably it >> allows stateless autoconfiguration. (However, this could have been >> done >> with 48 bits too.) But it does have the downside you mention by only >> leaving 64 bits for numbering subnets. The practice of giving all >> sites >> a /48 further deminishes the available bits. > > Wow ... it's even worse than I thought! Why bother even going to IPv6? > so you are making claims and comments on something you don't even have bothered to read the basic documentation on. Wow. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.2 iQA/AwUBP8zIyaarNKXTPFCVEQJ5bwCdEXkTSxDyYphqbAQh8mPDPK4CYjsAoIGR cPdEgj4Ws2eiz1ZJv4qMSjbx =fFoK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
