Unfortunately, the discussion has tended to center on ICANN as the only really visible example of an organization attempting to develop policy (which is being treated as synonymous with "governance").
To be practical, considering that ICANN never acted as the authority of the Internet governance, what's wrong to make ICANN the scape goat by giving ICANN governance, which has nothing to do with the Internet governance, to some of the countries?
Masataka Ohta
