Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security

[Iljitsch van Beijnum]

On 16-dec-03, at 12:06, jfcm wrote:

I suggest ISO should define an international trans network numbering 
scheme that could be adopted as the IPv6.010 numbering plan, the same 
way as the ccTLD list is the ISO 3166 2 letters list, and IDNA uses 
unicodes etc.
The ISO is already in charge of NSAP addresses. I don't see how 
importing the complexity that exists there into IP is going to help us.

This would relieve IETF from these user, political, etc. oriented 
inapropriate controversies.
There is very little, if any, controversy in IPv6 addressing. Ask for 
address space and you'll get it. Moving addressing issues to a new 
organization would in fact create controversy as it is virtually 
guaranteed that address policies and routing policies will fall out of 
alignment, to the detriment of the net as a whole.