On Tue December 16 2003 21:45, Franck Martin wrote: > It was replied to me a lot of technical reasons on how I could > filter otherwise. But I'm a human and I like to see it is an [ietf] > mail.
I see that it is an IETF mail by seeing that it got routed into my IETF folder. (It gets there by my filters checking whether Sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED]) On the other claw, sometimes I have to get my mail over the web, in which case the folder routing rules haven't been applied. For this reason, I'd support a *short* tag, such as "[ietf]". To those who bitch about the waste of bits: clamp down on topic drift, large signatures, unnecessary headers (including spam-detection hints!), etc. etc. etc. first! -- Dave Aronson, Senior Software Engineer, Secure Software Inc. (Opinions above NOT those of securesw.com unless so stated!) Email me at: work (D0T) 2004 (@T) dja (D0T) mailme (D0T) org Web: http://destined.to/program http://listen.to/davearonson
