I would offer that worrying about signed signatures when we don't have signed mail is much more of a waste than 7 characters prepended to an unsigned Subject line.
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Stracke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tag, You're It! > > > Dave Aronson wrote: > > >Long story short, here's my proposal: > > > >- Tag the stuff [ietf]. > > > > > Modifying the Subject: line is a Bad Thing; it invalidates digital > signatures. We're never going to get widespread use of > signed email as > long as we have pieces of mail infrastructure munging > messages to make > signatures useless. > > -- > /================================================================\ > |John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | > |Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com | > |Centive |My opinions are my own. | > |================================================================| > |Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. --I forget who| > \================================================================/ > > > > >
