On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Ed Gerck wrote:
>
>
> Dean Anderson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Ed Gerck wrote:
> >
> > > Dean Anderson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Ed Gerck wrote:
> > > > > What information theory says is that the probability of detecting
> > > > > spam is less than 100%.
> > > >
> > > > No, information theory doesn't say that at all.
> > >
> > > Sure it says, and that's why a spam filter will never be 100%
> > > effective. I guess we agreed on this before ;-)
> >
> > I think you must have missed my message noting our disagreement.
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg24213.html
>
> Let me make sure. You think then that a spam filter can be 100%
> efficient? If you do, please log off and go sell it. If you
> don't then I agree with you.
No, that isn't what I said. You need to re-read the message. It is
fairly clear.
--Dean
