Scott Bradner wrote:
might be better as:
In no way should this experiment or any future BCP for this small
number of cases take precendence over the IETF's normal mode of
operation. Specifically, these procedures are only to be
used when a working group agrees to use them.
Define "agrees". When a WG is blocked on consensus for a technical
issue, and someone proposes using the alternative process to reach a
decision, do you need consensus to use the alternative process? If so,
I'm skeptical that people who have been stonewalling each other on the
technical decision are going to agree to a process that means they don't
get to stonewall any more.
--
/=================================================================\
|John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com |
|Centive |My opinions are my own. |
|=================================================================|
|"If nobody believes what I say, I feel ineffective." "Oh, I don't|
|believe that." |
\=================================================================/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
