Thus spake "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have replied that I do not see the merit to your complaint, and have NOT > asked Rob Austein to change his address, have NOT asked ISC to change their > antispam policies, and have NOT asked SORBS to change ther listings - > having concluded that none of these is the IETF's business. > > (the alternative - declaring that every antispam function of every system > that is used by an IETF participant is a matter for the IETF to have an > opinion on, and possibly work to have changed, every time it causes a > message to bounce or be dropped - is simply not workable.)
While I disagree with Dean in general and also with most of his current argument, I think it is a reasonable request that IETF "officials" be given an @ietf.org email alias and that those aliases be published for use in situations such as this. It's probably going too far to require sending mail from those aliases; despite Dean's faults, he's smart enough to use the published alias if he gets a bounce from someone's personal or work address. S Stephen Sprunk "Those people who think they know everything CCIE #3723 are a great annoyance to those of us who do." K5SSS --Isaac Asimov _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
