Not to feed the troll, but, if I remember correctly, the overwhelming response is always: we don't need it. Procmail can filter fine without it.
So, since there's no one vehemently opposed to it (that I can remember), why not just turn it on, to avoid the quarterly request? Not everyone uses procmail / nice mailers to filter their mail. Some people are even forced to use Windows mailers! *shudder* -Dave On Thursday, 15 Jul 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > Short answer: > > No. > > Long answer: > > This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very > list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags. > > Harald > > --On 15. juli 2004 10:35 -0400 John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hi. > > > >Since I'm the apparent offender... > > > >Those little inserts are a function of list management software > >(which software is chosen and how it is configured), and not the > >actions of individual authors (despite the indication I manually > >included in this posting). If a change in how the IETF list > >works is needed, you probably need to take it up with the > >Secretariat or the IESG. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- David Frascone Fife. n. Small shrill instrument that rhymes with wife. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
