On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > scenarios C and D envision incorporating the *support function* for the > IETF. The IETF would remain an undefined entity under these scenarios. > > I've had another suggestion that the IETF (the real technical process > entity) should become a formally recognizable entity of some sort (possibly > an unincorporated organization).
The IETF is already describted as an activity of the ISOC, which is incorprated. I think the IETF also has paid employees. Aren't these people paid by the ISOC? If not, please correct this information. > But that's distinct from the idea of incorporating the support function, > and is NOT described in the current document. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
