This strikes me as oversimplistic. What if a commercial enterprise
wanted to license its IPR in such a way that it put no constraints on
open source, but retained constraints on commercial competitors? I'm
not sure you can get around a technical mandate for some kind of
license and still retain those options. -- Nathaniel
On Oct 13, 2004, at 10:55 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think it would be wonderful if the free software community could
come to a consensus about what their requirements are.
That's not hard. We need licensing conditions that don't require us
to either pay royalties or sign legal papers, and which don't inhibit
re-use of the code by restricting the area of application.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
