RL 'Bob' Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Brian Rosen wrote:
> >You guys don't have a problem with the "defensive suspension"/"no first
> >use" clauses, do you?
> >
> >Is there a "preferred" wording for it?
>
> I think you'll find virtually identical wording on this topic in several
> well-known licenses:
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.html
> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/afl-2.1.php
Indeed. The language in these licenses represents the community consensus
about patent termination. Yes, there really is one; the official line of the
Debian project is an outlier, in dispute within Debian itself.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
