On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 22:48:16 +0100, Gert Doering said: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 04:31:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So 40% isn't even *allocated* yet (saying that we're probably burning /8's > > faster than needed, but only 36% of the available space is actually routed. > > > > Sounds to me like we've got more time than 52 months, if we start doing > > stuff now to increase the usage efficiencies.... > > Do we really *want* that? > > I'd rather go for "legacy-free networks". Ditch v4, build proper v6 > networks.
Well.. that *would* be a preferable solution. I was merely pointing out that we're not quite as "up against the wall" as a projection of the burn rate of /8's would indicate.
pgpHcGXT8GUwZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
