Hmmm, looks like bits of the IETF61 WLAN don't have it though...
tjc$ ifconfig en1
en1: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,SMART,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::20a:95ff:fef4:c482 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
inet 130.129.134.203 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 130.129.135.255
ether 00:0a:95:f4:c4:82
media: autoselect status: active
supported media: autoselect
tcpdump is showing router solicitations going out, but no replies.
i am in munroe west.
tim
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:41:00AM +0900,
> Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 9 lines which said:
>
> > how come there's no IPv6 on the "IETF61" network?
>
> Apparently, there is:
>
> ~ % ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:B5:49:F8:22
> inet addr:130.129.67.235 Bcast:130.129.67.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::210:b5ff:fe49:f822/64 Scope:Link
> inet6 addr: 2001:468:c12:64:210:b5ff:fe49:f822/64 Scope:Global
> ...
>
> ~ % traceroute6 www.iijlab.net
> traceroute to sh1.iijlab.net (2001:240:0:200:260:97ff:fe07:69ea) from
> 2001:468:c12:64:210:b5ff:fe49:f822, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets
> 1 2001:468:c12:64::4 (2001:468:c12:64::4) 26.15 ms 0.924 ms 0.782 ms
> 2 2001:468:c12:1::1 (2001:468:c12:1::1) 14.643 ms 6.025 ms 5.321 ms
> 3 2001:468:ff:185c::1 (2001:468:ff:185c::1) 5.803 ms 5.494 ms 6.086 ms
> 4 nycmng-washng.abilene.ucaid.edu (2001:468:ff:1518::1) 29.869 ms 10.386
> ms 37.157 ms
> 5 chinng-nycmng.abilene.ucaid.edu (2001:468:ff:f15::1) 34.169 ms 43.274
> ms 31.786 ms
> ...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Tim
North American IPv6 Task Force Technologist Seminar
More info at http://www.ipv6seminar.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
