On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:02:18 GMT, Paul Vixie said: > given the relative ease of acquiring v6 address space and the relative > ease of deploying v4+v6 end hosts and either v4+v6 campuses or v6 tunnels > in v4 campuses, there is no incentive to do nat/v4 any more, and precious > little incentive to do nonat/v4.
*I* can get v6 connectivity easily (heck, I just boot my laptop and *wham*, as soon as I contact the network I get handed 2001:468:c80:2181:202:2dff:fe5c:1148/64 (And that's on my wireless card, no less.. ;) Now, having done that, I can either jump through lots of hassles configuring a 6to4 proxy, or I can just type www.cnn.com in the browser window. It isn't just whether *I* can/have done it, it's *also* about whether the resource I'm trying to contact sees ipv6 as something that needs doing.
pgpshMpmE8owB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
