whatever the merits of Pete's suggestion I think John makes a very important point when he says that it would be better to refer to a RFC by number rather than a BCP by number (and title) because the text can change while keeping the same BCP number (wwhich can not happen for RFCs) - this means that the IETF could (in theory) change the rules later on and bind to the ISOC to someting they did not get a chance to agree to.
iScott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
