In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Michael Richards
on" writes:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
>Is there a document that explains how 169.254/16 is used?
>And if so, how come RFC3330 does not reference it?
>
draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-17.txt, currently in the RFC
editor's queue. That, of course, explains why 3330 doesn't have the
citation -- it's not an RFC. (Arguably, 3330 should have cited the
I-D.)
--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
