On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:03:32 -0500, Tony Hansen wrote: >� Of course, the rule about -00 drafts could be modified to allow them to > >� be posted on the followup date IF and ONLY IF they are now a WG draft >� AND they've been previously published as an individual submission.
from the line of commentary that John Klensin has been pursuing, it might be worth looking at Tony's suggestion, in terms of effort and efficacy. The suggestion is reasonable one, if the community feels that there is important quality control (or equivalent) issue in strictly regulating name assignment. Unfortunately, it adds more procedure onto a process that is already signficant. Enforcing contingent restrictions take careful attention by Secretariat staff. Is this really the sort of thing we want to focus on? It's just a name. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker �a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: �www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
