> Terry Gray wrote: > Keith, > Quick note from the peanut gallery: I believe your vision is > only achievable if the address allocation policies for v6 are > such that every man/woman/child and enterprise can obtain an > "ample" amount of provider-independent v6 space (or some number > of address bits that the enterprise can *own*). If people feel > like they are held hostage to others for the operation of their > internal enterprise (or home!) networks, you can take it to the > bank that v6 NAT will become just as pervasive and entrenched > as v4 NAT is.
This is precisely why I have stated earlier that v6 NAT is unavoidable: 'every man/woman/child and enterprise can obtain an "ample" amount of provider-independent v6 space' Catch is we don't know how to make this scalable. We have tried for 10 years and we still don't. Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
