And I've had much *worse* experiences with the IESG requiring changes to documents ... including receiving suggested text (after many months of the document disappearing into a black hole) that actually *reversed* text inserted earlier at the request of an AD.
- Ralph On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 15:12 -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote: > Hi - > > > From: "Joe Touch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Keith Moore" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "John C Klensin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:45 PM > > Subject: Re: text suggested by ADs > ... > > Sure - and sometimes other ADs get involved, and it boils down to "what > > can you add/change to appease the other AD" rather than "what is > > sensible to add". > ... > > Though this is an interesting discussion, it is so far removed from my own > experience as a document editor and WG chair that I have to wonder whether > we've been working with the same IESG. > > Randy > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
