Keith,

> > > It's as likely to boil down to "how do we get this WG to realize that 
> > > there really is a serious technical problem with what they've created?" 
> > 
> > How about requiring to produce working code (and perhaps operational
> > experience) ?
> 
> working code is valuable in some cases - especially where it appears that
> the protocol is not easily implemented.  but working code won't provide 
> an indication of how well the protocol works in large deployments in the
> wild.  for that, analysis and/or modeling are the best tools we have.

How many of such analysis and/or modeling has been produced by the IESG ?

Yakov.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to